<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dan Gillmor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangillmor.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangillmor.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thank You, Tim Berners-Lee by Patricia Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/08/06/thank-you-tim-berners-lee/comment-page-1/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=490#comment-3535</guid>
		<description>Hear, hear. Tim Berners-Lee doesn&#039;t get enough credit for his brilliant creation. I add my thanks here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear. Tim Berners-Lee doesn&#8217;t get enough credit for his brilliant creation. I add my thanks here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thank You, Tim Berners-Lee by Rick McKnight</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/08/06/thank-you-tim-berners-lee/comment-page-1/#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick McKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=490#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>Actually, British Telecommunications (BT) claimed it owned a patent to hyperlinks, which it filed back in 1976 and was granted in 1989. They even demanded from several Internet service providers that they pay licensing fees on hyperlinks.

http://www.linksandlaw.com/linkingcases-other.htm#British Telecom v. Prodigy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, British Telecommunications (BT) claimed it owned a patent to hyperlinks, which it filed back in 1976 and was granted in 1989. They even demanded from several Internet service providers that they pay licensing fees on hyperlinks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linksandlaw.com/linkingcases-other.htm#British" rel="nofollow">http://www.linksandlaw.com/linkingcases-other.htm#British</a> Telecom v. Prodigy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by Tom</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>I do hope you understand that it&#039;s drop dead simple via a couple of user preferences to go back to &quot;snow leopard&quot; behavior. 

Ubuntu Linux is definitely the best of desktop Linux experience. It&#039;s also free of usability standards. Just the inconsistency of c&#039;n&#039;p between apps in Linux can drive one to madness. 

However for those that grind code for a living, osx or Linux are really the only viable choices in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do hope you understand that it&#8217;s drop dead simple via a couple of user preferences to go back to &#8220;snow leopard&#8221; behavior. </p>
<p>Ubuntu Linux is definitely the best of desktop Linux experience. It&#8217;s also free of usability standards. Just the inconsistency of c&#8217;n'p between apps in Linux can drive one to madness. </p>
<p>However for those that grind code for a living, osx or Linux are really the only viable choices in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by jim lofton</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>jim lofton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>I have not been paying too much attention to the new Lion OS. Mostly because I typically wait for the release problems to be identified and addressed. Yes Apple has been moving iOS and Mac OS closer together with the seeming intent to merge them. I totally agree that if they lock down the OS to such an extent that I can not acquire software from sources out side of the App store then I too may be looking for something other than an Apple for my next system. As long as Lion still has terminal and I can install the web design/development tools I prefer, then I&#039;ll stick with the Mac.

While I don&#039;t mind iOS on the phone for the extra security it affords in it&#039;s locked down nature, having it on the iPad has been a mixed experience. I really had hoped I could use the iPad as a extremely portable replacement for the laptop, but with out filesystem access and the ability to install alternative software outside of the App store it is limited. I don&#039;t need a full blown laptop/desktop for the work I do and the iPad would have been awesome. I do love using it to the extent that I do for communication, media, and surfing everywhere and anywhere, but it could have been much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not been paying too much attention to the new Lion OS. Mostly because I typically wait for the release problems to be identified and addressed. Yes Apple has been moving iOS and Mac OS closer together with the seeming intent to merge them. I totally agree that if they lock down the OS to such an extent that I can not acquire software from sources out side of the App store then I too may be looking for something other than an Apple for my next system. As long as Lion still has terminal and I can install the web design/development tools I prefer, then I&#8217;ll stick with the Mac.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t mind iOS on the phone for the extra security it affords in it&#8217;s locked down nature, having it on the iPad has been a mixed experience. I really had hoped I could use the iPad as a extremely portable replacement for the laptop, but with out filesystem access and the ability to install alternative software outside of the App store it is limited. I don&#8217;t need a full blown laptop/desktop for the work I do and the iPad would have been awesome. I do love using it to the extent that I do for communication, media, and surfing everywhere and anywhere, but it could have been much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by Leland Hendrix</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator>Leland Hendrix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 00:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-3120</guid>
		<description>It is entirely possible to install snow leopard on an Air that comes with Lion.  You just have to wipe it&#039;s drive first, because the &quot;recovery HD&quot; partition&#039;s existence (a fantastic feature on its own) causes the Snow Leopard installer to get confused and hang.

If you are familiar with the terminal, you can actually use it within Lion to REMOVE that recovery partition, and then install lion from boot up using your thumb drive from your last MacBook Air. 

The OS is not locked down in any way, and other than interface changes it works the same way all OS X versions have. 

Please respond if you&#039;d like further info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is entirely possible to install snow leopard on an Air that comes with Lion.  You just have to wipe it&#8217;s drive first, because the &#8220;recovery HD&#8221; partition&#8217;s existence (a fantastic feature on its own) causes the Snow Leopard installer to get confused and hang.</p>
<p>If you are familiar with the terminal, you can actually use it within Lion to REMOVE that recovery partition, and then install lion from boot up using your thumb drive from your last MacBook Air. </p>
<p>The OS is not locked down in any way, and other than interface changes it works the same way all OS X versions have. </p>
<p>Please respond if you&#8217;d like further info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by PolishOX</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-3108</link>
		<dc:creator>PolishOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-3108</guid>
		<description>Dan, don&#039;t be so doom and gloom.

What you want to do is entirely possible...just requires some unconventional means.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2389334,00.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, don&#8217;t be so doom and gloom.</p>
<p>What you want to do is entirely possible&#8230;just requires some unconventional means.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2389334,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2389334,00.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by Oliver</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-3093</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 03:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>Interesting post.  I am in a similar situation with a Snow-Leopard MacBook Air from March that I love (I switched from Windows two years ago; this is my second Mac).  As a software developer and a passionate computer user since the late 70s I am looking with great concern at what Apple/Steve Jobs are doing.  I am dabbling with mobile apps development, and I am choosing Android because I just prefer the open-ness of the platform over the dictatorial regime from Cupertino -- as polished as it might be.  And I don&#039;t like the idea of having to partner with Apple to sell any software.  Why should they suddenly get 30% of all software sales on their devices?  And why should I be at their mercy when it comes to approval of an app in the first place?

Windows 7 is actually not bad in comparison to earlier versions and I might eventually go back to that -- I love and use Linux on the server, but on the client it&#039;s always been a fight for me and I just don&#039;t have the patience and time anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  I am in a similar situation with a Snow-Leopard MacBook Air from March that I love (I switched from Windows two years ago; this is my second Mac).  As a software developer and a passionate computer user since the late 70s I am looking with great concern at what Apple/Steve Jobs are doing.  I am dabbling with mobile apps development, and I am choosing Android because I just prefer the open-ness of the platform over the dictatorial regime from Cupertino &#8212; as polished as it might be.  And I don&#8217;t like the idea of having to partner with Apple to sell any software.  Why should they suddenly get 30% of all software sales on their devices?  And why should I be at their mercy when it comes to approval of an app in the first place?</p>
<p>Windows 7 is actually not bad in comparison to earlier versions and I might eventually go back to that &#8212; I love and use Linux on the server, but on the client it&#8217;s always been a fight for me and I just don&#8217;t have the patience and time anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-2974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-2974</guid>
		<description>I often encounter new machines that will not run old versions of software/os, with Apple and Windows.  This could be a hardware compatibility issue, or something Apple has &#039;forced&#039; for its own reasons, but I don&#039;t think it really matters.

You say you upgrade your computer every year, but using a brand new os is too risky--even though you keep your old machine as a backup?  I would think that its riskier to hack an old os onto new hardware, than to simply move to the pre-installed Lion, but that&#039;s just been my experience.  When would you feel better about moving to Lion, 3 months, 6 months, a year?  If you encounter an unacceptable issue with the new machine, could you not use your backup machine until a fix/workaround is available?

 You&#039;ve had good results from Macs so far with presumably little hacking effort on your part.  You&#039;ve taken reasonable steps to mitigate the risk and protect yourself--again with minimal effort.  Yet you&#039;re willing to throw all that away, because of fear of issues that haven&#039;t even occurred?  If you&#039;re that risk-averse, and you feel so screwed that Apple has removed some kind of illusion of safety that you won&#039;t trust them ever, then you probably won&#039;t be happy with anything other than Linux, where you can control everything to your heart&#039;s content.  The downside of course is that you&#039;re not getting as much of your real work done while you&#039;re controlling and administering Linux, working around all of its quirks, building and troubleshooting broken open-source software, libraries, etc.  Good luck with that.

Also, Apple&#039;s &#039;proud history&#039; is not creating user-hackable computers.  It is instead creating solutions that work with minimal fuss and effort on the part of the user.  They&#039;ve done this better than Windows, and much, much, MUCH better than Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often encounter new machines that will not run old versions of software/os, with Apple and Windows.  This could be a hardware compatibility issue, or something Apple has &#8216;forced&#8217; for its own reasons, but I don&#8217;t think it really matters.</p>
<p>You say you upgrade your computer every year, but using a brand new os is too risky&#8211;even though you keep your old machine as a backup?  I would think that its riskier to hack an old os onto new hardware, than to simply move to the pre-installed Lion, but that&#8217;s just been my experience.  When would you feel better about moving to Lion, 3 months, 6 months, a year?  If you encounter an unacceptable issue with the new machine, could you not use your backup machine until a fix/workaround is available?</p>
<p> You&#8217;ve had good results from Macs so far with presumably little hacking effort on your part.  You&#8217;ve taken reasonable steps to mitigate the risk and protect yourself&#8211;again with minimal effort.  Yet you&#8217;re willing to throw all that away, because of fear of issues that haven&#8217;t even occurred?  If you&#8217;re that risk-averse, and you feel so screwed that Apple has removed some kind of illusion of safety that you won&#8217;t trust them ever, then you probably won&#8217;t be happy with anything other than Linux, where you can control everything to your heart&#8217;s content.  The downside of course is that you&#8217;re not getting as much of your real work done while you&#8217;re controlling and administering Linux, working around all of its quirks, building and troubleshooting broken open-source software, libraries, etc.  Good luck with that.</p>
<p>Also, Apple&#8217;s &#8216;proud history&#8217; is not creating user-hackable computers.  It is instead creating solutions that work with minimal fuss and effort on the part of the user.  They&#8217;ve done this better than Windows, and much, much, MUCH better than Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by John R. Grout</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>John R. Grout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>In hindsight, Apple started down its current path when they stopped selling fully-configurable mid-tier systems... a ways after the introduction of the G5 (though those early G5 chips were so balky and hot running that not many folks wanted one in a mid-tier box anyway).  That was a long time ago.

It appears that Apple will eventually switch all of its business to iThingies running on ARM processors, making the Mac OS X versus iOS controversy moot.  If Apple sells high-end systems, rather than ones that run chimeras like the new Final Cut Pro but not serious professional applications, they would continue to use Mac OS X... but perhaps Apple will stop selling their high-end systems too.  They can&#039;t be making too much money for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In hindsight, Apple started down its current path when they stopped selling fully-configurable mid-tier systems&#8230; a ways after the introduction of the G5 (though those early G5 chips were so balky and hot running that not many folks wanted one in a mid-tier box anyway).  That was a long time ago.</p>
<p>It appears that Apple will eventually switch all of its business to iThingies running on ARM processors, making the Mac OS X versus iOS controversy moot.  If Apple sells high-end systems, rather than ones that run chimeras like the new Final Cut Pro but not serious professional applications, they would continue to use Mac OS X&#8230; but perhaps Apple will stop selling their high-end systems too.  They can&#8217;t be making too much money for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why My Current Mac is Probably My Last by Terry Maraccini</title>
		<link>http://dangillmor.com/2011/07/21/why-my-current-mac-is-probably-my-last/comment-page-1/#comment-2943</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Maraccini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangillmor.com/?p=488#comment-2943</guid>
		<description>Been running 10.7 for almost a week with heavy usage. It runs exactly like Snow Leopard. It&#039;s stable, fast and customizable.  Linux qwill never be what you want it to be. It&#039;s a fragmented space where the only thing it has going for it is experimentation  and rock solid server performance. 

as a developer working on multiple platforms including iOS, I find Lion to be like iOS only if you want it to be. What I do find is that 10.7 certainly is thinking about the future and not dwelling on the past. 

Google&#039;s Chrome OS is a vague and amorphous attempt at marrying the desktop and mobile and it has arrived DOA.
as I read over at macworld; operating systems are a matter of choice. But your reasons for leaving are just not true at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been running 10.7 for almost a week with heavy usage. It runs exactly like Snow Leopard. It&#8217;s stable, fast and customizable.  Linux qwill never be what you want it to be. It&#8217;s a fragmented space where the only thing it has going for it is experimentation  and rock solid server performance. </p>
<p>as a developer working on multiple platforms including iOS, I find Lion to be like iOS only if you want it to be. What I do find is that 10.7 certainly is thinking about the future and not dwelling on the past. </p>
<p>Google&#8217;s Chrome OS is a vague and amorphous attempt at marrying the desktop and mobile and it has arrived DOA.<br />
as I read over at macworld; operating systems are a matter of choice. But your reasons for leaving are just not true at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

